![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Интересный журнал
Фуллтекст, как обычно, через сайхаб.
Originally posted by![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
timelets at Scary Halloween Reading
Originally posted by
timelets at Scary Halloween Reading Valeria Kasamara, Anna Sorokina. Post-Soviet collective memory: Russian youths about Soviet past. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.06.003
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967067X15000197
Abstract:
The research [conducted in 2012] is focused on the image of the Soviet Union and that of its successor – the Russian Federation – in the minds of the Russian student youth.
The participants of the poll were 100 students from the leading Moscow universities. They had been born after the Soviet Union collapse, so, the majority of them have a very obscure idea of the Soviet reality, simultaneously feeling nostalgia for the Soviet political past.
---
As evidenced by the included results of the study, students from the leading Moscow universities are indeed worried by the lack of a single unifying idea in contemporary Russia, which in the Soviet Union was communism. The students did not know what could unify modern society; they did not know what they could be proud of in contemporary Russia.
---
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967067X15000197
Abstract:
The research [conducted in 2012] is focused on the image of the Soviet Union and that of its successor – the Russian Federation – in the minds of the Russian student youth.
The participants of the poll were 100 students from the leading Moscow universities. They had been born after the Soviet Union collapse, so, the majority of them have a very obscure idea of the Soviet reality, simultaneously feeling nostalgia for the Soviet political past.
---
As evidenced by the included results of the study, students from the leading Moscow universities are indeed worried by the lack of a single unifying idea in contemporary Russia, which in the Soviet Union was communism. The students did not know what could unify modern society; they did not know what they could be proud of in contemporary Russia.
---
The Soviet Union had power. Yes, we were feared, at least. Those Norwegians would not have dared to stop and fine our fishing boats, like they do it now. Now it's all done easily (male student, 24 years old).
The Soviet Union is a country of happy, smiling, working people. The policemen, too, are smiling. Personally to me, that is the image that immediately comes to my mind. And also there definitely needs to be some sort of holiday. All people are happily crowding around, singing some kind of soulful song. People are working hard, but at the same time none of them complain of their fate, nor talk about how difficult life is for them. Everyone is satisfied (male student, 24 years old).
They had the Young Octobrists, the Young Pioneers, and we have nothing. And that was very important – it could, in a psychological sense, stimulate people to actively participate in their society, not for monetary reasons or some personal benefit, but rather for moral values, such as prestige. It's not a desire to buy «Dolce and Gabbana» jeans; there they had a completely different motivating factor” (female student, 19 years old).
Contemporary Russia lacks a national idea that would unite us and move us forward. Psychologically, this very negatively affects people's activities, their hope in the future. And if there is no hope in the future then, naturally, there is no inclination to get anything done. People felt withdrawn. This leads to moral problems: the great, open Russian soul, about which much has been written by poets and writers, both domestic and foreign, is disappearing to somewhere. This part of our mentality gives way to people becoming evil and getting caught up in their minute problems, gives way to people needing to think about how to live, what to do, where to go (female student, 18 years).
no subject
no subject
no subject
Я бы посмотрел, что бы они запели
no subject
>100 students from the leading Moscow universities
>The interviews were conducted predominantly with the first year students of the universities
>The median age of the respondents was 18 years old.
Хуита.
no subject
no subject
Причина - типа могут стать элитой, потому как в правительстве видите ли столько-то являются выпускниками этих институтов - это какой-то пиздец.
Это не научное исследвоание, а хуита, с которой "можно работать" разве что Саше Сотнику.
no subject
И ты хочешь сказать, что это нетипично для их возраста? :)
>> хуита, с которой "можно работать" разве что Саше Сотнику
Какой ты привередливый!
Вообще, перепсто был сделан для привлечения внимания к журналу, а не конкретной статье. Если ты знаешь более лучшие научные издания по постсовку, не стесняйся поделиться :)
no subject
Для того и нужно проводить нормальное научное исследование - чтобы выяснить, что типично, а что не очень. А это чисто журналистика, начиная уже с заголовка.
no subject
no subject
С ней действительно можно работать в той степени, в какой она полезна для составления опросника для полноценного исследования. Для этого интервью годится - собрать первичные данные от выёбывающихся студентов.
Например: сравните уровень доброты людей в СССР по отношению к современникам в РФ. И дальше стандартная 5-балльная шкала от "заметно добрее" через "да хер бы их знал" до "заметно злее" - типа такого.
Чтобы не делать выводов по типу: "The students had quite a vague understanding of totalitarian regimes and, perhaps, this was the reason why they idealized much of the Soviet past" - добавить туда вопросы про отношение к репрессиям, цензуре, дефициту итд, которые самим своим присутствием напомнят о неприглядных сторонах, чтобы всю рабочую память не занимали кадры из художественных фильмов Эльдара Рязанова.
В конце концов отношение к СССР - тема комплексная, потому и опросник должен быть комплексным. Опять же можно составить итоговый лист, где попросить приоретизировать важность каждого отдельного вопроса - чтобы помогло минимизировать когнитивные искажения.
По крайней мере это то, что сразу пришло бы в голову мне. Социологам из ВШЭ всё это в голову не пришло, потому как в душе они журналисты.